Posts tagged landscapephotography
The iconic locations are iconic or a reason

I was watching a video on YouTube where the photographer insisted he didn’t want to shoot the same images as everyone else. He wanted to find a unique perspective on the locations, and was critical of photographers who just got the obvious shot and then moved on.

I’m all in favour of finding your own unique images. but I also think you should remember why certain images are iconic. They are that way because they are beautiful. To go to San Francisco and not shoot the Golden Gate Bridge would seem strange. To go to Edinburgh and not shoot the Castle, similarly.

But having got those iconic shots, I agree, move around, find new angles. Find new perspectives, wait for the light to change. In short, experiment.

So to an extent I agree with what the photographer was saying, but I disagree that you shouldn’t shoot the obvious photograph.

This is a picture of Queens View in Perthshire. It’s a location you can stop the car at, get out, point the camera and take a great image without having to work too hard. I didn’t have a lot of time on this occasion, but it would have felt wrong not to stop.

I’d encourage anyone to get out and take the great images for themselves. They may be similar to others, but when it’s your picture you have a real connection to it that you won’t get from someone else’s photograph.

I like the image below, but I know it’s not much more different to a thousand others shot from that spot. But I’m ok with that, because this one is mine :-)

Thanks for looking.

The Great British Weather!

These 2 photos are taken from slightly different points on the same Loch (lake), near my home in Scotland. The sandy photo of Loch More was taken exactly a year ago today, during one of the driest spells in modern history. On that day I actually walked across the Loch. Contrast that with a more typical shot of what it usually looks like, with water around 1.5-2metres high. You really never do know what the British weather will throw at you, and I thought it made for an interesting comparison.

Photographically, they both make interesting shots I think, and I hope you like them. Thanks for looking

The lure of the long exposure

While I was reviewing a number of my images for use on my website and facebook page, I came to realise there were a few common themes developing.

One of these themes was definitely my love of a long exposure, particularly when photographing water. A long exposure can be anything from 1/2 second upwards. If you haven’t already tried doing this, it can give wonderful results as the water and clouds in the sky can be blurred, making them milky smooth.

I love that effect, particularly when applied to seascapes or waterfalls. It gives images a real sense of movement - which takes a 2 dimensional image and levitates it to something much more 3-dimensional in nature (though obviously not truly 3-dimensional in the way the eye sees it).

To achieve long exposure, you need to slow your shutter speed down to at least 1/2 a second. Depending on the conditions, particularly the amount of light, you will almost certainly need a filter to achieve this. A standard neutral density filter is a wonderful compositional tool. I use Lee Filters, but there are a number of brands out there. Be careful of cheap filters though, they will often create an unpleasing colour cast. My advice would be to buy the best you can afford.

I cover long exposure techniques in much more depth on my workshops so do please check out upcoming workshops you may be interested in.

This particular image had an exposure time of 90seconds, which completely smoothes out the water and I really love the effect. Thanks for looking!

Luck in landscape photography.

There is a real element of luck in landscape photography. How will the light be? What will the tide be like? Have I already missed the best time of day?

I think that’s true, but you can also increase your chances of being lucky by getting out as often as possible. This week I spent a couple of hours at my local beach, and really nothing was working photographically. I waited until sunset and was just giving up when the light suddenly appeared.

If I had followed my initial thought, which was to give up and go home, I would not have seen this light and would never have gotten the image.

So yes. we are lucky if we get great light - but can you increase your chances of being lucky by just being out there!

Intimate Landscape Photography

Simplicity and elegance is all around us if we look for it.

Anyone can take great shots of flowers, so why not get out and have a try!

You don't need any expensive equipment - most phone cameras are great for this kind of shot. The key is to get down to ground level, choose a subject that is isolated from other flowers (no overlaps in the background!) and ideally shoot in soft light (e.g. when it's cloudy). If your phone has a "portrait" mode, use that to blur the background.

A square crop helps make the image pleasing to the eye.

If you’d like to further improve your landscape photography, why not book yourself onto one of my workshops. It really is the best way to develop as a photographer!

Check out the page for full details

Just another sunset....

Sometimes it’s hard to resist getting out at sunset. Especially at this time of year, when the sun is setting around 9pm in the UK. We’re not quite there yet, but I always find June - August quite challenging photographically, as the days are very long and the light isn’t always conducive to shots like this.

This year though, I’m going to make a conscious effort to find different types of shots to see me though the summer. Keep coming to the blog to see how I get on!

For now, just another sunset from me.

Oh…. but I do love it ;-)

"Rule number 1 - never shoot in the midday sun." Really??

As photographers we are conditioned to always seek-out the best light, and most often that is to be found around sunrise and sunset. At these times the sun is low in the sky and it creates a very pleasing soft light that can really enhance an image.

Probably for that reason I think I’ve been conditioned to avoid “harsh” light, which can make images look flat and uninteresting. That can be the case, but when there are clouds in the sky, that isn’t always true. This shot was taken at almost exactly midday, but the clouds defused the sunlight enough to allow for a really pleasing image. The colours in the sea and the sand are particularly striking I think.

Photographers can get a bit obsessed with “rules” in photography. I prefer to think of them as guidelines rather than rules. They do help, but we shouldn’t be constrained by them. I’m glad I ignored them on this occasion and took the shot anyway!

Working hard to get the shot!

We’ve been enjoying some lovely weather here in the UK, and this sunset ended an amazing day. The sky was a deep orange glow for jus a few minutes before it set.

I really like the way the river meanders through the scene towards the mountains in the background. There was a bit of climbing involved in getting this photo. Often though the best results come after the most effort. I hope you like it.

When is a landscape photograph not a landscape photograph?

There’s a debate amongst landscape photographers as to whether a landscape photograph with people in it is actually a landscape photograph at all. I must admit I hardly ever include people in my photographs, mainly because I want the landscape to tell the story of what it was like to be there at the time.

This image was an exception though. I think the boat really helps to tell the story of this photograph. Without the boat it is just an image on an (albeit very nice) rainbow. With the boat included it tells much more of the story of the day and you can start to imagine what it must have been like for the fishermen in that weather.

So is a photograph with people in it truly a landscape photograph? Is it travel photography? Does it even matter?

I’ll let you decide that for yourselves. Thanks for looking :-)

Waterfalls are tricky to photograph.

I had a long trip this week for work, but had an hour or so spare on the journey, so decided to stop and take an image in a location I love, but hadn’t been to for a few years.

This waterfall is from a place called Big Burn Falls, close to the village of Golspie in Sutherland, Scotland. It’s hidden away but well worth a visit if you get the chance.

I was really surprised - but in hindsight shouldn’t have been - at how much water there was cascading down the falls. It’s now officially Spring here in the UK, and heavy rainfall is almost guaranteed. Because of all the water, it was difficult to capture the detail within the falls. I think I did the best I could with this image, but I look forward to going back when the flow is less rapid.

There are some amazing rocks that I think will make the image even better with less of a torrent to block them.

It can also be difficult to give your waterfall shots scale and context, which is why I included a significant section of river in the photograph. It gives that sense of both scale and context, which would be lost if the image was just the falls themselves.

I also loved the green moss and foliage on the rocks, which I think enhances the picture a lot. I hope you love it too, and bear these things in mind when you’re taking pictures of waterfalls. They can often look amazing to the eye in 3 dimensions, but it is tricky to turn them into great 2 dimensional images. Good luck and thanks for visiting!